Comments:
The Saga of Daniel WRETSTRÖM///ProductZional Terrorism and its controllants beyond the well-organized terror cases worldwide, almost the same Imperialist falsification lobbies, nothing else...///ZioniImperialist controlled&Jewish financial supported TERROR///And this story dedicated to Comrade Daniel as a tribute; yes, this is The Saga of Daniel WRETSTRÖM; a braveheart MARTYR who sacrificed himself for next generations...(Int. English language version) ** - TERRORISM, between system and oppressed peoples? - Violated methodes practicing between truth and the lie machines of officially parasites... ** - Will Anyone Dare to Ask Why? - Why, dear dare? - Attention!! Meta-religion does not support the ideas and opinions expressed in this article. And we are not associated in any way to the source. The ideas and opinions expressed are responsability of the sources. - What are you talking about? - Clip!.. I recommnd that you watch on this; "Interviews with Comrade David Duke, National President , European-American Unity and Rights Organization (EURO) broadcisting on September 15, 2001 - Let's listen!.. - America has a very big problem... We have just experienced the shock of the most spectacular and deadly terror attack in modern history. In an almost surreal scene from a Hollywood movie, on September 11, 2001 hijacked passenger planes crashed directly into the New York World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington. Thousands of Americans were maimed and killed. The costs might even go over the one trillion dollar mark, and the event may even trigger world-wide economic depression. These terrible acts of terrorism must be fought with every ounce of American resolve. And those who commit such heinous acts must be punished to the fullest severity of the law. No such acts must ever be permitted on American soil. That being said, how then do we then protect ourselves from terror in the future? Because of increased scientific knowledge around the world, the next terror could be far more deadly than what happened on September 11. The next horrific occurrence might not even entail an explosion of any kind, but the silent mass death of a biological or radiation attack. The bad news is that no matter how many billions of dollars the government spends or how many bombs it drops, it is impossible to completely protect ourselves from these great dangers. In fact, the more bomb-dropping and devastation we do, the more likely a future terroristic response. We have moved into an era in which even sheer military might is no protection. No longer can strong nations attack weak ones with impunity. The tiniest nation or political entity can easily revenge itself with mass terror. No nation is invulnerable, even the strongest nation on earth. Unless we understand the why of these terroristic acts, the motivation behind them, we can not prevent a repeat of such terrorism in the future. We Americans must ask ourselves why we now suffer such terror. When a clock stops, we ask why. Is it not plugged in? Is the battery dead? Is it broken? If so, why is it broken? When you have a problem, if you don't ask why and get some good answers and act on them, it will persist. It may well even become a lot worse. The Zionist-dominated media has provided us in living color the gory details of this bloody attack on the American people. They have even told us who might be behind it, but so far they have carefully avoided giving an understandable reason why the attack took place. Calling the attackers "cowards" is, of course, untrue. The terrorists committed an indescribably horrible and ruthless act against the American people, but certainly they are not cowards. Kamikazes may be misguided, but sacrificing one's own life for a cause is not cowardice. And calling the perpetrators cowards or madmen doesn't answer the question of why these horrendous acts occurred, unless one thinks every coward and madman wants to blow up the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Those descriptions prevent people from discovering the reasons why the event actually occurred. And, if we want to prevent such occurrences from happening in the future, it is absolutely vital that to understand "why." Maybe a good first question to ask is why these "crazy," "cowardly," Arabs never attack Switzerland or Sweden? What could it be that those countries do or don't do that causes them to be ignored while we are targeted. Let me be very, very blunt. The ultimate cause of this terrorism stems directly from our involvement in and support of the criminal behavior of Israel. Terror in response to Terror The Palestinians and many of their Arab allies have been the target of a half century of unrelenting Israeli terrorism. In the late 1940s the Zionists took over Palestine and drove out 700,000 people from their homes through widespread acts of terrorism. Among those events was the sadistic massacre of 254 Palestinian mostly old men, women and children at Deir Yassin. It was an especially vicious, cold-blooded massacre characterized by Jews cutting apart the bellies of pregnant women. 1 After the bloodletting, the murderers then purposely publicized the event so as to make the people flee in panic from their homes and businesses from which they still haven't been allowed to return. Former Israel Prime Minister, Menachem Begin, a participant in this horrendous massacre, boasted of the importance of Deir Yassin in his book The Revolt: The Story of the Irgun. He wrote that there would not have been a State of Israel without the "victory" of Deir Yassin. "The Haganah carried out victorious attacks on other fronts... In a state of terror, the Arabs fled, crying, 'Deir Yassin. 2" Nor did the massacres cease after the establishment of the Jewish State; they continued in times of both peace and war. Following are the names of some of them: Sharafat Massacre, Kibya Massacre, Kafr Qasem Massacre, Al-Sammou' Massacre, the Sabra And Shatila Massacre, Oyon Qara Massacre, Al-Aqsa Mosque Massacre, the Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre, the Jabalia Massacre. 3 In a policy of ethnic cleansing, Israel continues to keep residents of Palestine who were born there and whose families lived there for countless generations, from returning home. At the same time, it gives generous incentives for genetic Jews who never lived in Palestine to immigrate from the far corners of the world. The British also suffered greatly from Israeli terror, such as the horrendous bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. Israeli terror has not stopped since. Israel has more prisoners per capita than any other nation of the world, more than Stalinist Russia, or Red China during its worst periods. It routinely tortures its Palestinian prisoners, and is in fact the only nation in the modern world that legally sanctions torture. In fact, a Jewish human rights group in Israel confirmed in a 60 page report that 85% of Palestinian detainees undergo torture while in custody. 4 Even a major New York Times article by the Jewish Joel Greenburg, stated matter-of-factly that Israel tortures 500 to 600 Palestinians every month. 5 Israel has targeted and assassinated thousands of Palestinian leaders, and this includes scholars, clerics, businessmen, philosophers and poets, anyone who inspires the Palestinian people to patriotism. These assassinations have occurred all over the world, even in the United States. In the process they have killed many thousands of women and children. They have even repeatedly bombed Palestinian refugee camps packed with women and children. Not only did they establish their Israeli state over Palestinian land, (in 1948 Palestinians personally owned over 90 percent of it) the Jews took almost all of the Palestinian personal property: the land, farms, homes and businesses. After they drove out the Palestinian refugees and refused their return, they then passed an "abandoned property" law that confiscated Palestinian property and gave to the Jews. The law even has the chutzpah to forbid ever selling any of their stolen land to Palestinians. 6 Former Jewish Secretary of State Madeleine Albright called the death of 500,000 Iraqi children from starvation due to UN sanctions, "acceptable." In 1982 Israel invaded Lebanon. During their invasion and 18 year occupation an estimated 40,000 civilians died. Israel relentlessly bombed and attacked cities and villages and also many hospitals and orphanages (as documented by the Norwegian Red Cross) and devastated the ancient and once beautiful city of Beirut. The current Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon, doesn't dare even step foot in Belgium or the Netherlands, fearing an indictment of the World Court for war crimes. Sharon is responsible for the murder of two thousand of refugees in the Sabra and Shatila camps in Lebanon. Israel shot down a Libyan passenger airliner over the Sinai Peninsula killing 111 people. And it is has not just been the Palestinians who have suffered from Israeli terror. Zionist Terror Against the United States Americans have also suffered from Zionist terror. In fact, Israel has committed a number of acts of war against the United States. Israel has a long record of terrorism against the United States going all the way back to 1954. In that year, the Israel government plotted to blow up American installations in Cairo and Alexandria and blame it on Egyptian nationals. By chance the plot failed and was uncovered. It was named the Lavon Affair after the man who supposedly set up the terrorism, Pinhas Lavon, the Israeli Defense Chief. He resigned in 1955 over the incident. 7 In 1967, Israel purposefully attacked with unmarked jet fighters and torpedo boats, the U.S.S. Liberty, an American Navy vessel of the Sinai Peninsula, even machine gunning the deployed life rafts of the ship. The attack killed 31 American servicemen and wounded over 170. 8 They sought to sink the ship, kill all the Americans and blame it on the Egyptians so they could have American support to conquer larger areas of the Arab world. The attack on the Liberty was nothing short of a vicious act of war against the United States by Israel. In spite of the fact that U.S. Secretary of State Dean Rusk and navy chief Admiral Moorer said that the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel was deliberate. The all-powerful Zionist Lobby prevented a formal Congressional investigation. If the Lobby can even cover up horrendous Israeli crimes against America, it's no wonder they can cover up Israel's endless crimes against the Palestinians. Yet, after the Liberty attack America didn't even reduce our billions of dollars of aid, in fact the story quickly vanished from the news after a few short days. What is left of the USS Liberty after the Israeli military attacked it on June 8, 1967. Thirty four US soldiers lost their lives. In 1986 Israel actually caused us to wrongly go to war and militarily attack another nation. The Mossad planted a transmitter in Tripoli, Libya and then broadcast terrorist messages in Libyan code indicating Libyan responsibility for killing two Americans in the bombing of the La Belle discothèque in Germany. 9 (It was later proven that Libya had nothing to do with the bombing) By use of this fraud, Israel induced the American bombing of Libya. American bombs wrecked havoc there. One of those killed was the infant daughter of the Libyan President. It is certainly a dastardly act of war against a nation to induce it into wrongly attacking another nation. Only a truly evil enemy of America would do such a thing. Every Palestinian and Arab is aware that Israel's half century of terror could never have occurred without the active financial, military, and diplomatic support of the United States. They know that the Jewish Lobby has control of American Mideast Policy and the Zionists can get whatever they want from Congress on issues important to them. It was American support of Israel's brutal invasion and occupation of Lebanon in the 1980s that led directly to the bombing of the U.S. Marine contingent, killing 300 American young men. The Involvement of America in Israeli Crimes Arabs know that almost every bomb that kills their people comes from America, Every bullet, every tank, every fighter plane, is manufactured or paid for by American dollars. It is America's billions of dollars of support that have enabled the Jewish state to terrorize the Arab people for half a century. Even though Israel invaded Lebanon and killed thousands of civilians, America never threatened to bomb Tel Aviv (as it did Iraq) if Israel refused to obey UN resolutions to withdraw. A comparison of America's reaction to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait to that of Israel's invasion of Lebanon is instructive. America's one-sided policy foreign policy can be illustrated by the different treatment afforded Israel and Iraq. Iraq invaded Kuwait. Israel invaded Lebanon. Perhaps 3000 Kuwait civilians died in the initial war with Iraq. 40,000 Lebanese died from the time of the invasion through the occupation. Iraq disobeyed UN resolutions to leave Kuwait. Israel disobeyed UN resolutions to leave Lebanon. (for 18 years) Iraq broke international conventions on chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Yet Israel is a far greater offender, having one of the greatest stores of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons in the world Iraq refused UN inspections. Israel has always refused UN inspection. For these violations we bombed Iraq. In response to Israel's crimes, America just continued to send more billions of dollars. American foreign policy was and continues to be Israeli policy. Israel was not threatened with even a cutoff of U.S. aid as thousands of Lebanese civilians died from the Israeli actions. Iraq was once a friend of America with whom we bought oil and did much business. America actually supported Saddam Hussein and Iraq's war with Iran. Iraq did nothing against the United States, but it made the mistake of becoming a strong enemy of Israel. So the Jewish and the Jewish-controlled gentile bureaucrats, and Jewish-dominated media quickly made our former friend, Saddam Hussein, into our archenemy. We dropped more explosives on Iraq country in a few weeks than we had in the whole of the Second World War. We killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis including tens of thousands of civilians. Then we engaged in a blockade and embargo of Iraq that even the anti-Iraq United Nations says led to the deaths of at least 1,200,000 children and hundreds of thousands of elderly. Let those Americans who don't understand the why of this terrorism concentrate on this shocking fact. One million, two hundred thousand children have died as a direct result of our policy toward Iraq. The Jewish Lobby and the Jewish-dominated media are very careful not to let the American people fully understand the real reason for the Iraqi war or the true issues in the Palestinian question. They really don't want Americans to know why so many millions in the Arab world hate us and why the number grows larger every day. They don't want us to know the real reasons why Americans are so hated -- because it is the Jewish bosses of American foreign policy who are the one's responsible for this growing hatred of America. Imagine the anger and feelings of despair that would drive men to sacrifice their own lives to get at us. The Zionist bosses know that by America's supporting the criminal policies of Israel spawns hatred against America. They are certainly aware that bombing and going to war against nations solely for Israel's benefit creates dedicated and fanatical enemies against America, enemies who will seek revenge in American blood. Of course, they never put America's interests first; their own Jewish interests are always paramount. In actuality, they are fully aware that the brutal and stupid acts of terror that recently happened in New York and Washington only help the Zionist cause by engendering enormous American anger at Israeli enemies, and make Americans more easily manipulated to do the bidding of Israel. Think about who really gained from this terror. Have the Palestinians benefited? This terrorist act destroyed all the progress the Palestinians have recently made with world opinion. It has blinded the world to Israeli terrorism. Israel is the only winner in this tragedy. They will now have a green light to do anything they want against the Palestinians. They can kill any of their foes whether they are violent or non-violent. They will get all the money they want from the American people, and no one will be thinking about their on-going suppression, murder and human rights violations against the Palestinian people. No, the Zionists are the only benefactors of the horrendous day of terror on September 11, 2001. Ironic isn't it, that although Zionist criminal actions led to this terror, only the Zionists will benefit from it. Of course, they reason they benefit because the American mass media is completely in their hands 10 and it will never ask the proper questions of why these horrendous events are happening. Unfortunately, too few people will ever hear voices such as mine who dare to challenge the Zionist lies. That's why we are in this mess, because a foreign power has become the most powerful lobby in the American government and controls the direction of the mass communication media in America. Let me repeat that one more time. The primary reason we are suffering from terrorism in the United States today is because our government policy is completely subordinated to a foreign power: Israel and the efforts of world-wide Jewish Supremacism. American Flags are flying everywhere in America in the aftermath of the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. That is good, for we need to be more patriotic. If we were more patriotic for the real interests of America rather than for Israel, we would not now suffer from terrorism. And truly, what could be more patriotic than wanting our own country to be led by our own people in the service of America; not a foreign power or a powerful minority. Yes, we must fight tooth and nail against any terrorists who attack our country. But, we must understand why this terror is occurring, and how it has been spawned. It has occurred because of long-standing treason against the United States and her people. What has Zionism cost the American People? The Jewish Lobby and media power has cost the United States about 6 billion dollars a year in foreign aid and weapons, almost one third of America's entire foreign aid budget during the last half century and as much money spent in America's drug war. It has poisoned our relations with the oil-rich Mideast nations. In response to our policies, the Arabs came together and developed their "oil weapon" which has cost Americans at least ten at least ten trillion dollars in higher oil costs. It has alienated the entire Arab world, leading to destruction or confiscation of billions of dollars of American property in those countries, kidnapping of American citizens, and generated enormous hatred for the American people. How has Israel has paid us back for our support? They have continually spied on us on us (the Jonathan Pollard Case), sold our highest secrets (such as to the biggest nucleur threat to us currently in the world: the Communist Chinese) 11 and stolen our enriched uranium for their illegal nucleur weapons. 12 They have launched terrorist attacks against the United States such as the Lavon Affair and the Attack on the USS Liberty. Both these acts were nothing short of vicious acts of war against the United States. Providing false information for America to wrongly go to war against another country is also nothing less than an Israeli act of war against the United States. Yet, in response to these despicable actions against America, our Zionist controlled leaders did not even reduce our billions of dollars of financial and military aid to Israel. We give Israel about 6 billion dollars in aid each year, that is more than all the nations of Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean and South America. What is the latest cost of our subservience to the criminal actions of Zionism? The latest price we have paid is the horrendous acts of terrorism on September 11, 2001. The powerful agents of Israel in American media and government are ultimately responsible for this terror against the United States just as surely as if they themselves had piloted those planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. And now they cynically plan to use the terror that they themselves created to increase the cycle of violence against Israel's enemies. You can be sure that the Zionist powers plan to do far more than simply punish the perpetrators of these events. America will once again be used to strike against whoever Israel wants. An indiscriminate or intemperate response from America would ultimately produce even more hatred against America, and bring more terroristic acts upon the heads of American people. The increasing cycle of hatred is exactly want the Zionists want, for their aim that we will fight Israel's enemies for them, spilling our blood instead of theirs. They are only ones who truly benefit from America's pain. Rather than Israel, we will pay the ultimate price. Unless we heal the wounds and give America a better course, every new missile and bomb we send, will come back to us again. Every life we take in foreign lands will result in more American lives lost here and abroad. America will sink more and more into uncertainty and fear. We must have cool heads now and break this cycle of violence. Many traitors in our government have supported Zionism's criminal activities rather than the true interests of the American people. They have spawned the hatred that drove these terrible acts. Unless their power is broken Americans will be haunted by an increasing specter of terrorism. Let us pray for the American victims of these events and for their suffering families. Let us swiftly and harshly punish the perpetrators of these dastardly acts. But, even more importantly, let us understand why these events occurred and how we can heal the hatred against our nation. Once we understand the reason why, then we will all agree on the sure way to prevent such terroristic acts in the future. The solution to this huge problem is extremely obvious and it is very simple. America must heed the farewell address of the Father of our Country and "avoid foreign entanglements." And we must always put America and the American People first. ** - I understand... - What did you understand? - Terror is never on error... as long as thus Zionist Imperialism continues and all the imperialists aware that terror is their product to continue sucking... - I agree with you!.. ** - On 25 june 2003 told the correspondents mostly on the peace... The following article was written before the announcement of a temporary ceasefire by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the Al-Aqsa brigades. This ceasefire may have raised hopes that the Road Map could bring about a sharp reduction in the bloodshed for a sustained length of time. However, as the article explains the Road Map gives no answers to the terrible conditions faced by the Palestinians and the huge difficulty of achieving a lasting peace in the Middle East under capitalism. CWI online. Sharon's deadly assassination squads... ARIEL SHARON appears to be biting the hand that feeds him. The assassination of another leading Hamas activist by an Israeli hit squad has further undermined George Bush's efforts to put a lid on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict through its 'road map' peace initiative. This apparent wrecking strategy of Sharon comes only weeks after the US Congress approved a massive $9 billion loans package to bolster Israel's faltering economy. US secretary of state Colin Powell, attending the World Economic Summit in neighbouring Jordan, barely concealed his anger at the Israeli government's action. He said the murder of Abdullah Qawasmeh in Hebron was a "matter of concern" that "could be an impediment to progress". However, Sharon had no regrets, saying the assassination was "a vital action designed to provide security for Israel's citizens". In fact, such actions will guarantee a retaliatory strike against Israeli citizens by Hamas, which has spurned attempts by Egypt and the US-approved Palestinian prime minister Mohammed Abbas to secure a ceasefire from the various Palestinian militias. Another indication of Sharon's insincerity is his attitude to the 'illegal' Jewish settlements in the West Bank. These settlements on Palestinian territory have flourished since Sharon became PM in 2001, despite some token dismantling in recent days of some 'hilltop settlements'. Sharon reportedly said last week that the settlers should continue to build, albeit more discreetly. So it's hardly surprising that most Palestinians are rightly cynical of the road map achieving anything positive, let alone a "viable Palestinian state". What they see is only a continuation of the occupation, oppression and impoverishment as the Israeli government's response to the Intifada. Many Israelis also remain sceptical of peace under Sharon's leadership. An Israeli newspaper opinion poll found that 40% of Israelis believe that the recent assassination attempt of Abdel-Aziz al-Rantissi was a deliberate act to wreck the road map - 67% want these assassinations to stop to enable peace talks. Not that the road map, with its lack of concrete measures to resolve such issues as the right of return of Palestinian refugees, the status of Jerusalem, the financing of a 'viable Palestinian state' etc. offers a way forward for the working classes of the region. George Bush's plan is designed to bolster pro-US Arab regimes whose populations are incandescent at the US invasion of Iraq and the continuing national oppression of the Palestinians. The only viable solution to the wars, national conflicts, grinding poverty and extremes of inequality of the Middle East is the transformation of the region through the building of mass revolutionary socialist movements. People's Mojahedin - victims of imperialist rivalry... TWELVE MEMBERS of the exiled Iranian People's Mojahedin (MKO) have set themselves alight in a number of European capitals, including London, in protest at the arrest and detention of 160 MKO members in France. The French authorities are to investigate 17 MKO members for "conspiring with a terrorist organisation". Eleven are being held in custody including MKO leader Maryam Rajavi. The MKO is the political wing of the Mojahedin Khalq guerrillas who oppose the Iranian regime. The People's Mojahedin, a curious blend of Islam and 'Marxism', was a prominent force on the left during the early days of the 1978-79 Iranian revolution before being banished under Ayatollah Khomeini's regime (see the socialist 14 June). Its 10,000-strong militia has military bases inside Iraq and had enjoyed the patronage of Saddam Hussein. These bases were bombed by US forces during operation 'shock and awe'. The guerrillas have subsequently agreed to disarm since the US occupation of Iraq. The MKO has found itself the victim of inter-imperialist rivalry between the EU, principally the French government and the US. The US has targeted Iran as part of an "axis of evil" that aids and abets terrorism and that is pursuing a nuclear weapons programme. It has opportunistically encouraged regime change during the recent student-led protests against Iran's clerical leaders. However, the French government is pursuing its own imperialist policy to cultivate its capitalist interests in the Arab and Muslim countries of the Middle East. This includes maintaining friendly trade and diplomatic relations with Tehran, hence the arrests of the MKO members at its Paris compound. Imperialist wishes 1: AS THE US-led occupation of Iraq faces mounting opposition, the occupying forces keep up their aim of making the country into a 'free-market economy'. The US wants more privatisation - moving resources and workers from state enterprises to what they hope will be profit-making private-sector ventures. Paul Bremer, US 'civil administrator' for Iraq, acknowledged that this move would exacerbate social relations - mainly with mass sackings. Bremer made vague promises of some kind of "social safety net", paid for by Iraq's oil! Who'll gain most if this plan comes to fruition? The oil companies, mainly in the USA, and other big business enterprises, including a few Iraqi fat cats. Imperialist wishes 2. TOP MAGAZINES in Britain's construction and civil engineering are running a conference on business opportunities arising from the Iraq reconstruction process. They will advise big business (or small business wanting to grow fat) on "the realities of doing business in Iraq", on "the challenges of doing business in a country which has been closed to business over the past decade" and other issues such as "developing an effective risk management strategy" in "what will become one of the fastest growing economies in the world". Well, that's that sorted then. After years of warfare at various levels, years of sanctions which "closed Iraq" to trade and had a devastating effect on the population, big business can see light at the end of the tunnel. For themselves! Military big spenders... THE WAR in Iraq pushed global spending on military purposes up 6% last year, says the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Expanding at twice the rate of the year before, it has now grown to $794 billion (£500 billion a year). US imperialism - responsible for three-quarters of the increase - accounted for 43% of global military spending last year (up from 36%). Washington spent an alarming $336 billion ($210 billion) on arms. What's more, US defence budget estimates for 2003 showed a planned 32% increase in arms procurement over the 2002-2007 period, in line with ideas of a new global 'Pax Americana' with "full spectrum dominance". Other world powers find it hard to keep up. Western Europe's arms spending actually went down. Russia overtook the US as the world's biggest arms exporter while China, with imports estimated at growing 18% in 2002, was the biggest importer of arms. India and Pakistan, which came close to nuclear conflagration last year, both vastly increased their arms imports last year - India's 72% rise in imports making it the world's second largest buyer of arms from abroad. - The Socialist, paper of the Socialist Party, CWI in England and Wales shows who were the true terrorists... - Who were the "Bartards in Pentagon", ans Blix accused? - AlterNet Channel's correspondent asked same question... Steven Rosenfeld explains more on this subject on June 24, 2003 - Lets listen!.. - The Truth about the Lies... First we have a little notice... Editor's Note: With many Americans still exulting in the military victory in Iraq, it's hard to make a case that the administration's ends don't justify its means. However, the fact the administration has not found Iraqi weapons of mass destruction goes far deeper that whether the White House can be trusted, says Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington. The lingering WMD question reveals that this administration not only lied to Americans and the world about the reasons it went to war, but did so with a continuing disregard for some of the most fundamental U.S. and international laws. Phyllis Bennis was interviewed by TomPaine.com's Steven Rosenfeld. Hans Blix is retiring as the head of the U.N. weapons inspection teams. In recent days, he's made some statements about the Bush administration's characterizations of the U.N.'s work prior to the war in Iraq. What has he said? Well the first thing he said that was significant in this recent period was, in an exclusive interview with The Guardian in the U.K., he said that he was the victim of a smear campaign. He said "I was smeared" and he said by "bastards" – he used that word – in Washington. Now when he was pressed about whether he included the members of the U.S. administration in his characterization of "bastards," he said no, that he was referring to former arms inspectors and a former Swedish prime minister, who he didn't name but it was clear who he was referring to, who had spread critical assessments of his work during the whole period. But what's more significant, I think, is he's also taken the position that the U.S. decision to go to war based on evidence that turned out to be faulty, calls into question the whole issue of under what circumstances a war could be legal? And he comes down squarely on the side of a war is only acceptable if the [U.N.] Security Council has authorized it. Now, given the position that he's coming from, that's a very significant statement. Why is it significant in that context? Clearly he feels the fact that weapons of mass destruction have not been found, en masse, is, in a sense, a vindication of the U.N. inspection's prior work, right? Right. I don't think the issue is so much about the prior work. The attack on him from these unnamed "bastards" in Washington – and clearly [this includes] the members of the administration – he's presumably too diplomatic to admit it, but there's no doubt the members of the administration were furious with him. And at least on a not-for-attribution basis, were prepared to smear him as he said other bastards did from Washington. But what's also significant about this is that he referred specifically to earlier occasions in which the use of force had been based on intelligence claims that turned out to be false. He cited, specifically, U.S. attacks. He cited the bombing of the Chinese Embassy during the Kosovo War, in Belgrade, and said that was the result of false intelligence. He spoke of the bombing of a pharmaceutical factory in the Sudan, having been destroyed in the same way, also based on false intelligence. Then he went on to say, and I quote here, "A war was started based on intelligence (referring to Iraq). We still don't know if it was accurate. But it raises the question, on what basis can a war be started?" That's very significant, I think. What can one do with that question? Or where does one go from here, because clearly that's a legitimate point. But in a certain sense, might makes right with the Bush administration. Well, might makes might, at least. I don't know if it makes it right. But the power to do things gives them the willingness to do those things, and to claim legitimacy in doing so. I think what this speaks to is the question of how in the future, as well in the continuing investigation on Iraq – because we should be clear that this investigation is not over yet – the notion of resolving whether Iraq has weapons of mass destruction has become something far more important than just determining whether there is a remaining threat of a nuclear arsenal left over, or some such thing, as was once claimed. It's now a question of whether the entire episode of this U.S. war, which was claimed to be waged in the name of weapons of mass destruction and Iraq's links with Al Qaeda, was actually based on completely false evidence: whether that evidence was false when it reached the White House; whether it was cooked by the White House; whether it was both initially false and then cooked, so that all the various players are involved. The possibilities are legion for what this really represents. But it's extraordinary that we have not seen yet in the United States, even with these statements by Hans Blix; even with the recognition that no weapons of mass destruction have been found; even with the lies of the Bush administration – including as recently as a couple of weeks ago, when President Bush, with great joy, it seems, announced "we have found the weapons," when he was referring to two laboratories that had been found, in which inspectors have found absolutely zero sign of any actual chemical or biological contaminants. So this eagerness to move forward with their war, regardless of any actual information, is what's really at stake here. And the question of whether, in the future, weapons of mass destruction will be found in Iraq, goes directly to this issue. Those of us who were saying before that the weapons of mass destruction claim was a false claim, that it was a bogus claim – it wasn't because we never thought there could be any scrap of a weapon. There still could be. There may well be some scraps of some left-over weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. I'll say that right now just as I said it throughout the run-up to the war. But what we do know is there was nothing that was a viable strategic threat to the United States. That was a lie. That there were viable weapons was a lie. And the notion that we were right and they were wrong has not yet reached a level of outrage in the U.S. press, or among the U.S. public, it seems, in anywhere close to the level of outrage that it has sparked in the U.K. It wasn't only the American people who were lied to by our president. But it is the whole world that was led down the primrose path of lies and deceit by this administration, claiming evidence that they simply did not have. We don't know yet, we may never know, whether the evidence was simply ignored, made up or cooked. What we do know is they never had the evidence they claimed to have. We never had to go to war. Hans Blix may be trying to rescue or restore his reputation, but still the larger question remains of who is going to hold this administration accountable. Unfortunately, that is where the issue of might and right come into play. The United Nations should be in a position to hold this administration accountable. It should be U.N. weapons inspectors that are on the ground in Iraq, not the U.S. military, led, ironically enough, by a former U.N. weapons inspector from the earlier team – UNSCOM – the former director of UNSCOM, David Kay, has now been appointed special advisor to CIA Director [George] Tenet, to be his chief in charge of the weapons search. Why not go to the people who know how to do this? It was UNSCOM in their first years, from 1991 through 1995, who found and destroyed virtually all of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. In the years after that, what UNSCOM found was documents, not any existing weapons after that. That situation remains in place. That's who should be in charge. The problem is the U.S. has made clear, through its launching of this war without Security Council authorization, that they are not prepared to accept the legitimacy of U.N. rule, despite what the U.N. charter says, despite the U.S. being a signatory of the U.N. charter that says that war is only legitimate, either if it's authorized by the Security Council, which this was not, or if it's a question of direct and immediate self-defense, which this was not. Given that the U.S. has taken itself completely outside of the parameters and the requirements of international law, we probably should not be surprised that the U.N. is simply not in a position of power to hold the U.S. accountable. Is anything that might come from Congress too little, too late? At this point, I think it's very important that Congress move on this. It certainly is too late. It is important that it happen in the context of the increasing power concentration in the executive branch, which we're seeing, which is so dangerous in how this war was launched and waged. So certainly a congressional challenge to that concentration of power would be very important. It's not sufficient though. This is an assault on the legitimacy of international law as a whole, and it's a matter for the entire world. The whole world is paying the consequences – the people of Iraq, most specifically – but the whole world is paying the consequences for this Bush administration move, and it should be international jurisdiction that holds the U.S. accountable. Any likelihood of that? No so far. I don't think we can be optimistic about that anytime soon. Member states of the United Nations are terrified. The vote that the U.S. forced three weeks ago, to endorse the U.S.-British occupation of Iraq, endorse the U.S. war belatedly, came as a result of extraordinary U.S. pressure on member states. There is no willingness to stand defiant of the U.S. right now. We saw with the passage of the new resolution, three weeks ago, we ended an eight-and-a-half month extraordinary moment, in which the U.N. was doing exactly what it was designed to do by its founders: standing against war; standing defiant of an illegal war; preventing that war from going forward. It delayed the war. It prevented the war from happening when the U.S. wanted it. It prevented the U.S. from waging war with an international imprimatur, an international legitimization, and then it collapsed after eight-and-a-half months of doing the right thing, the Security Council collapsed under U.S. pressure. The goal, I think, now of those of us who are committed to international law, to internationalism, to the United Nations, is to figure out what it's going to take to make the U.N. able to go back to that position once again. So we're in an era where might makes right, even if it may not be right. And it doesn't matter if it starts with a bunch of lies, because if you have the biggest military you can just bully your way through. Absolutely. The question is, are we going to be in a position in this country to hold our government responsible for those violations of international law as much as we hold it responsible for the violations of U.S. law? All of those things are important. If we allow our government to get away with this power grab, both domestically and internationally, we are setting the stage for a far graver loss of democracy, both in our country and around the world, than anything we have seen so far. - Who is interviewed Blix? - Steffo.. Steven Rosenfeld is a commentary editor and audio producer for TomPaine.com. ** - Interesting.. I have an additional offical lie, here... - Lying Us Into War By Dennis Hans, AlterNet February 12, 2003 President George W. Bush and his foreign-policy team have systematically and knowingly deceived the American people in order to gain support for an unprovoked attack on Iraq. Before I catalog the Bush administration's "Techniques of Deceit," let me acknowledge that no U.N. resolution requires the president to be honest with the American people. The fine print of Resolution 1441 imposes no obligation to treat Americans as citizens to be informed rather than suckers to be conned. He may mislead, distort, suppress, exaggerate and lie to his heart's content without violating a single sentence in 1441. So if compliance with 1441 is all that matters to you, read no further. Turn on the TV and tune in Brokaw, Rather, Jennings, Blitzer or Lehrer, to name five of the journalistic imposters who control what you hear and see, who seem psychologically incapable of conceiving of Bush as a liar, and who wouldn't have the guts to call him one even if they reached that conclusion. But if you are an American citizen who believes in the bedrock democratic principle of "the informed consent of the governed," read on. Why lie? The president and many of his top advisers have wanted to invade and overthrow the government of Saddam Hussein for a long time. But they knew they couldn't sell such a war against Iraq to a majority of Americans and a majority in both houses of Congress if they acknowledged just how pitifully weak and unthreatening Iraq really is. If, however, the administration could portray Iraq as an imminent, mortal threat to the United States – and even a shadowy accomplice in the terrorist attacks of 9-11 – then a majority of the population might come to see an invasion of Iraq not as unprovoked U.S. aggression but as a wholly justified response to what Iraq did to us. That is precisely what the administration has done. In an October poll by the Pew Research Center for People and the Press, "66 percent believed [Saddam] was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States." Yes, two-thirds of Americans had come to believe a horrible thing about Saddam that the Bush administration knew for a fact was false, even as it encouraged its lesser spokespeople to continue to promote the connection. According to a Knight-Ridder poll conducted in January (.http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/4911975.htm.), 41 percent of us believe Iraq has a nuclear weapon RIGHT NOW and another 35 percent are unsure or refused to answer the question. Only 24 percent know what Bush knows for an absolute fact: Iraq has no nukes. And even many in that 24 percent might not realize that Iraq would still be several years away from developing a nuke even if we did the unthinkable and allowed them to import the vast array of high-tech equipment needed just to get started. How do people get such ridiculous thoughts in their head? A dishonest administration plants them there with a steady drumbeat of exaggerations, distortions and lies. In a process I call "lie and rely" (.http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0301/S00062.htm.), the administration relies on a cowed and craven news media to present their lies to the American people as fact – or at a minimum, as still-to-be-confirmed assertions by respected officials with a reputation for truth-telling. A handful of print reporters occasionally exposing the most egregious lies can't begin to overcome the effect of the steady drumbeat of lies reported as truth day after day on television. If we factored out of the opinion polls all the people who have internalized White House disinformation as fact, support for the president's position would plummet. Without the support of these misled millions, Bush wouldn't have been able to ramrod through Congress a blank-check declaration. He wouldn't have had that blank check to use as a bludgeon against the U.N., and the U.S. wouldn't be on the verge of committing an act of unprovoked aggression. How Bush lies: The Techniques of Deceit Although Bush presents himself to the world as a plain-spoken, straight-shooting friend of the common man, he regularly employs a variety of techniques to deceive the very people most inclined to trust him. So far, I have tallied 14 techniques. But there are more to be uncovered, and there are far more examples than I can include here. Consider this the tip of a deceitful iceberg. In the paragraphs that follow I first will describe the technique of deceit. Then I will illustrate it with one or more quotations or propaganda themes, placing within brackets that portion of the quote that illustrates the technique. Then I will explain how the president applied the technique. Unless otherwise noted, the president's words are from the State of the Union address. 1) Stating as fact what are allegations – often highly dubious ones (this is a staple of Bush's speeches and Powell's U.N. presentation; I'll limit myself to three): a) "From three Iraqi defectors [we know] that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had several mobile biological weapons labs. These are designed to produce germ warfare agents and can be moved from place to a place to evade inspectors. Saddam Hussein [has not disclosed] these facilities. He [has given no evidence] that he has destroyed them." What we "know" is that defectors make this unproven claim. We don't know if they were paid or coached to make the claim, or volunteered it on their own. For more on this, see Point 9 of the analysis ( .http://www.traprockpeace.org/firstresponse.html.) of Powell's address by Dr. Glen Rangwala, Lecturer in Politics at Cambridge University, an advisor to Labor Party opponents of Tony Blair and perhaps the world's foremost authority on U.S. claims about Iraq, which may explain why one never sees him in the U.S. media. Rangwala notes that one defector made no mention of the labs in his first press conferences. It was several months later, after "debriefings" by the U.S. and the Iraqi National Congress, that he started talking about mobile labs. Hans Blix told the Guardian newspaper of Britain (.http://truthout.org/docs_02/020603A.htm.) he has seen no evidence that these mobile labs exist. Acting on tips from the U.S. about labs disguised as food-testing trucks, he investigated. "Two food-testing trucks have been inspected and nothing has been found," he said. That doesn't mean that such labs don't exist, but at this point there simply is no proof of that claim. It is NOT an established fact. b) "The British government [has learned] that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." Wrong verb. What he should have said is the Brits assert this but have produced no evidence of its veracity. The Brits have offered no date for these efforts, but "recently," in this case, may well mean "the 1980s." IAEA director Mohamed Elbaradei has for weeks been asking – so far, in vain – for the U.S. and Britain to provide "specifics of when and where." He said in a Jan. 12 interview, "We need actionable information." (Interview cited by Rangwala in his invaluable "Counter-Dossier II," ( .http://traprockpeace.org/weapons.html.) c) "We've [learned] that Iraq has trained Al Qaeda members in bomb making and poisons and deadly gases." (Bush's televised October speech) The L.A. Times reported a few days after that speech that CIA director "Tenet's letter was more equivocal, saying only that there has been 'reporting' that such training has taken place. Unlike other passages of the letter, he did not describe the reporting as 'solid' or 'credible.'" .http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/la-na-cia11oct11.story. 2) Withholding the key fact that destroys the moral underpinning of an argument (and, in Powell's case, reveals him to be a blood-drenched hypocrite): "Iraq's weapons of mass destruction are controlled by a murderous tyrant, who [has already used chemical weapons to kill thousands of people.]" (Bush's October speech) The problem here is that much of Bush's national-security team aided and abetted those crimes. After the worst attack, on Halabja in 1988 near the end of the Iran-Iraq war, the Reagan team covered for Saddam by implicating Iran, then prevented Congress from imposing tough sanctions on Iraq. Joost R. Hiltermann, an official with Human Rights Watch, shows in a recent column for the International Herald Tribune (.http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0117-01.htm.) that Saddam was likely emboldened to use ever more lethal concoctions to polish off the Kurds because he knew from past gassing experience in 1983, 1984 and 1987 that he could always count on the support of Reagan, Powell and George H. W. Bush. The latter's son has yet to mention this in any of his righteous condemnations of Saddam. There are any number of governments who have the moral standing to condemn Saddam's gassing of the Kurds. The one headed by George W. Bush does not. Powell, of course, is the current administration's knight in shining armor, the trusted figure who commands the respect even of the European leaders who cannot stomach Bush. But give a listen to Peter W. Galbraith, former U.S. ambassador to Croatia and now professor of national-security studies at the National War College in Washington, D.C.: "the Kurds have not forgotten that Secretary of State Colin Powell was then the national security adviser who orchestrated Ronald Reagan's decision to give Hussein a pass for gassing the Kurds." .http://www.boston.com/globe/magazine/2002/1215/coverstory_entire.htm. 3) Misrepresentation/Invention: a) "I would remind you that when the inspectors first went into Iraq and were denied – finally denied access, a [report] came out of the Atomic – the IAEA that they were [six months away from developing a weapon]. I don't know what more [evidence] we need." (Bush speaking at a news conference Sept. 7 with Tony Blair) As Joseph Curl reported three weeks later in the conservative Washington Times, there was no such IAEA report: "In October 1998, just before Saddam kicked U.N. weapons inspectors out of Iraq [actually, they were withdrawn], the IAEA laid out a case opposite of Mr. Bush's Sept. 7 declaration: 'There are no indications that there remains in Iraq any physical capability for the production of weapon-usable nuclear material of any practical significance,' IAEA Director-General Mohammed Elbaradei wrote in a report to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan" (.http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020927-500715.htm.). To this day, the administration has yet to produce a convincing explanation for Bush's bogus assertion. 4) Delegated lying/Team lying: Iraq was involved with 9-11 hijacker Mohamed Atta, via an Iraqi agent who met him in Prague in the spring of 2001, and thus the Iraqi regime may have participated in some fashion in 9-11. (summary of major, long-lasting propaganda theme) For the most outrageous, easily disproved, yet highly effective lies, such as the Iraqi connection to 9-11, sometimes the wise course is to assign personnel far removed from the president to push the lie. That way, the president's credibility won't suffer when the facts – known to the administration months before it stopped peddling the lie – come out. And in a perverse fashion, the man at the top of this disinformation pyramid, the president, GAINS credibility for the disinformation in his own speeches, because commentators will note what a cautious and careful performance it was, given that he steered clear of the not-yet-confirmed 9-11 connection. The farther out of the loop the designated lie-pushers are, the better: The administration can more easily keep from them the intelligence data that flat-out refutes the lie, which helpsthose lie-pushers who are more convincing when they THINK what they're saying might be true than when they know for a fact it's not true. For our purposes, whether the speaker believes what he says is irrelevant. What matters is that the administration is consciously deceiving the public. The most aggressive pushers of this story have been neoconservative extremists Richard Perle, James Woolsey, Ken Adelman and Frank Gaffney, who either serve on the Defense Policy Board or are otherwise tangentially connected to the administration. (Gaffney has even tried to link Iraq to the 1995 terror bombing in Oklahoma City.) See this article ( .http://slate.msn.com/id/2070410/.) for details on how this myth stayed alive long after intelligence pros definitely disproved it. Of course, now that the Atta link has petered out, another al Qaeda "connection" of comparable validity is being spread – this time by Powell and Bush. 5) Straw man: "The risks of doing nothing, the risks of assuming the best from Saddam Hussein, it's just not a risk worth taking." Notice that Bush doesn't name anyone who advocates "doing nothing." The whole idea behind DOING inspections and containment is that everyone knows we can't take Saddam at his word. Here, for instance, is former President Jimmy Carter's eminently sensible and non-violent "do-something" strategy to ensure the security of Iraq's neighbors as well as the United States: .http://alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=15084.. 6) Withholding the key fact that would alert viewers that the purported grave threat is non-existent: "We've also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical and biological weapons across broad areas. We are concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using UAVs for missions [targeting the United States]." (October speech) Bush omits the fact that the vehicles have limited range, thus requiring Saddam to transport the vehicles to our coast line WITHOUT BEING DETECTED. The odds of that happening start at a billion to one. (Dana Millbank exposed this lie last October in the Washington Post. The Post link has expired, but you can read this summary of the lies Millbank exposed: .http://www.thedubyareport.com/malleablefacts.html.. 7) Using mistranslation and misquotation to plant a frightening impression in the minds of trusting citizens that is the exact opposite of what you know to be true: "Saddam Hussein has held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear scientists, a group he calls [his 'nuclear mujahedeen' – his nuclear holy warriors]." (October speech) Here Bush plays on two fears of the public: of Islamist holy warriors and nuclear weapons. But Saddam runs a secular state and has no ties to Islamist terrorists such as al Qaeda (despite other lies to the contrary). As for nukes, Iraq's production capabilities had been destroyed completely by 1998, and today Elbaradei is in the process of verifying that Iraq has not taken even the first baby steps in what would be a mammoth effort to rebuild a nuclear infrastructure – an infrastructure that would be virtually impossible to hide. Equally insidious on Bush's part is the mistranslation and misquotation. In "Counter-Dossier II" ( .http://traprockpeace.org/weapons.html.), Dr. Glen Rangwala, observes that the speech Bush is referring to was delivered by Saddam "on 10 September 2000 and was about, in part, nuclear energy. The transcription of the speech was made at the time by the BBC monitoring service. Saddam Hussein actually refers to 'nuclear energy mujahidin,' and doesn't mention the development of weaponry. In addition, the term 'mujahidin' is often used in a non-combatant sense, to mean anyone who struggles for a cause. Saddam Hussein, for example, often refers to the mujahidin developing Iraq's medical facilities. There is nothing in the speech to indicate that Iraq is attempting to develop or threaten the use of nuclear weapons." Was Bush aware of the mistranslation and misquotation? We'd have to inject him with truth serum to find out. Even if some senior intelligence official did the deed and kept the accuratequote and translation from Bush, it's obvious who is setting the deceitful tone in the administration. The official would have every reason to believe that this is just the sort of dirty trick – played on the unsuspecting American citizenry, not Saddam Hussein – that this president would love. 8) Putting the most frightening interpretation on a piece of evidence while pretending that no other interpretation exists: "Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes [suitable for nuclear weapons production]." Those tubes, unaltered, happen to be a perfect fit for a conventional artillery rocket program. For details, see the tubes section in my essay "An Open Letter to the U.N. About Colin Powell" ( .http://commondreams.org/views03/0204-07.htm.). The Washington Post's Joby Warrick ( .http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35360-2003Jan23.html.) adds this: "The tubes were made of an aluminum-zinc alloy known as 7000-series, which is used in a wide range of industrial applications. But the dimensions and technical features, such as metal thickness and surface coatings, made them an unlikely choice for centrifuges, several nuclear experts said. Iraq used a different aluminum alloy in its centrifuges in the 1980s before switching to more advanced metals known as maraging steel and carbon fibers, which are better suited for the task, the experts said. Significantly, there is no evidence so far that Iraq sought other materials required for centrifuges, such as motors, metal caps and special magnets, U.S. and international officials said." Following Powell's address, Susan Taylor Martin of the St. Petersburg Times ( .http://www.sptimes.com/2003/02/06/Worldandnation/A_strong_case__but_is.shtml.) reported this: "Powell's speech was 'not quite accurate' on two points, according to the Institute for Science and International Security, a nonpartisan organization in Washington that deals with technical aspects of nuclear proliferation. Contrary to Powell's claim, anodized tubes are not appropriate for centrifuges and the anodization, designed to prevent corrosion, would have to be removed before the tubes could be used, said Corey Hinderstein, assistant director: 'It's not to say it would be impossible to use anodized tubes for centrifuges but it adds an extra step.' She also challenged Powell's comment that the tubes must be intended for a nuclear program because they meet higher specifications than the United States sets for its own rocketry. 'In fact, we found European-designed rockets that had exactly this high degree of specificity,' Hinderstein said." 9) Withholding highly relevant information that would weaken your case, because what you really want to obtain from the citizenry is "the UNINFORMED consent of the governed": North Korea's "secret" nuclear-weapons program wasn't a secret to the administration last fall. Yet it kept the information to itself, waiting till very late in the congressional debate over Iraq to inform not the entire public and Congress, but merely a relative few members of Congress. Thus, the Bush team didn't have to explain – well before each House even began to debate the various Iraq resolutions – exactly why the administration had no problem seeking a non-invasion solution to a crisis far more grave and imminent than Iraq. 10) Bold declarations of hot air: a) "[The only possible explanation], the only possible use he could have for those weapons, is to dominate, intimidate or attack." "Deterrence" is also a generally understood reason to develop WMD. Just ask the leaders of North Korea, Israel, Pakistan, India, Russia and the U.S. Deterrence and regional "balance of power" considerations were obvious factors in Saddam's efforts in the 1980s to develop nuclear weapons. Not the only factors, but factors nonetheless. b) "Every chemical and biological weapon that Iraq has or [makes] is a direct violation of the truce that ended the Persian Gulf War in 1991." (October speech, national television) As Rahul Mahajan correctly observes ( .http://www.accuracy.org/bush/.), "There are no credible allegations that Iraq produced chemical or biological agents while inspectors were in the country, until December 1998. The reason we don't know whether they are producing those agents or not since then is that inspectors were withdrawn at the U.S. behest preparatory to the Desert Fox bombing campaign." Visit the Institute for Public Accuracy website ( .http://www.accuracy.org.) for detailed critiques of Bush's major addresses on Iraq. 11) Creating in the public mind an intense but unfounded fear: "[Knowing these realities], America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof – the smoking gun – that could come in the form of a [mushroom cloud]." (October speech) Iraq cannot turn American cities into mushroom clouds because it has no nuclear weapons and no long-range missiles to fire the nukes it does not have. The world is not about to let Iraq under Saddam resurrect its nuclear-weapons program. But even if the world did, Iraq would still be several years away from being able to develop that bomb. 12) Citing old news as if it's relevant today, while leaving out the reason it's not: a) "The International Atomic Energy Agency [confirmed] in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein [had] an advanced nuclear weapons development program, [had] a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb." IAEA has also confirmed, that they shut the program down and destroyed all the production facilities - seemingly relevant facts: In October 1998, Elbaradei reported to the U.N: "There are no indications that there remains in Iraq any physical capability for the production of weapon-usable nuclear material of any practical significance" ( .http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020927-500715.htm.). 13) Transference: "[This nation fights reluctantly], because [we] know the cost, and [we] dread the days of mourning that always come." Bush is deliberately confusing the sensible, compassionate American people with his bellicose, bullying self. 14) Hallucinatory lying: Bush's assertion, based on absolutely no evidence, that Saddam hopes to deploy al Qaeda as his "forward army" against the West: "We need to think about Saddam Hussein using al Qaeda to do his dirty work, to not leave fingerprints behind," he told a Republican audience in Michigan prior to the congressional elections. (See David Corn's report at The Nation's website: .http://thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&pid=124..) "We need to think about" Bush using Adelman, Woolsey, Perle and Gaffney to do Bush's dirty work, so as to not leave presidential fingerprints on the hoariest lie of all – that Iraq was an accomplice in 9-11. 15) Withholding the key fact that would show your principled pose to be a pose devoid of principle: "Saddam Hussein [attacked Iran in 1980] and Kuwait in 1990." (U.N. speech, Sept. 12, 2002) The Swedish government is entitled to condemn Iraq for invading Iran. The current U.S. government – featuring key players from the very Reagan administration that supported Iraqi aggression through much of the 1980s – is not. If you surround yourself with officials who supported the aggression in real time, you're not entitled to be angered by it 20 years later. Conclusion: What to do with a president who is trying to lie us into a war It is not one single lie that has an effect on the public. It is the cumulative effect of dozens of lies, big and small, reiterated daily and challenged rarely. That is the effect that has brought us to where we are today. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, speaking January 19 on ABC ( .http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/03/01/25_rumsfeld.html.), offered the media splendid advice on how they should handle in their broadcasts and articles a leader that lies: "Well, first, Saddam Hussein is a liar. He lies every single day. . . . He is still claiming that he won the war. His people are being told every day that they won. It was a great victory in 1991 when he was thrown out of Kuwait and chased back to Baghdad. Now, it seems to me that almost every time you quote something from him, you should preface it by saying 'here's a man who has lied all the time and consistently.'" That's good advice for Brokaw and company, but what about the citizenry? What should we do? Do we as a nation want to follow our dishonest president into an aggressive, unnecessary war? I say the wiser course is to stop the war train in its tracks and intensify inspections, which will give the American people the breathing space to decide what exactly we should do with a leader who has sunk this low. Dennis Hans is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, National Post (Canada) and online at TomPaine.com, Slate and The Black World Today (tbwt.com), among other outlets. He has taught courses in mass communications and American foreign policy at the University of South Florida-St. Petersburg, and can be reached at .HANS_D@popmail.firn.edu.. - Very Bushy way... A Big Liar and behind him Tory B-Liar... - Power needs much more powerty by this bushy way... They need terror to have much more power on the world... Naturallky, jackals accuse lambs in whole history... ** - Why forget the main redacturs the moral and ethic rules? - Cash is sweeter than honoured tittles... Listen to this clip, please!.. - The Corruption of Journalism in Wartime By Ted Rall, AlterNet June 3, 2002 When I arrived in Afghanistan last November, Operation Enduring Freedom – the American bombing campaign that eventually toppled the Taliban – was being hailed by the U.S. media as an unqualified success. Precision bombing and first-rate intelligence, the Pentagon claimed, had kept civilian casualties down to a few dozen victims at most. Long-oppressed Afghan women burned their burqas and walked the streets as the country reveled in an orgy of liberation. Or so we were told. The amount of disjoint between television and reality was shocking. The "new" Northern Alliance government was no better than the Taliban; with the exception of the U.S.-appointed former oil-company hacks in charge, they were Talibs. Women still wore their burqas, stonings continued at the soccer stadium and the bodies of bombing victims piled up by the thousands. Not only was the War on Terror failing to catch terrorists, it was creating a new generation of Afghans whose logical response to losing their friends and parents and siblings and spouses and children would be to hate America. Why didn't the truth about the extent of civilian casualties get out? I blame the journalists, though Lord knows, some of them tried. As a novice correspondent for The Village Voice and KFI-AM radio in Los Angeles, I carefully studied the pros. A brilliant war reporter for a big American newspaper – he'd done them all, from Rwanda to Somalia to Kosovo – filed detailed reports daily from his room down the street from mine as I charged my electronic equipment on his portable generator. The next day we'd hook up a satellite phone to a laptop to read his pieces on his paper's website. Invariably every mention of Afghan civilians killed or injured by American air strikes would be neatly excised. One day, as a test, he fired off a thousand words about a 15,000-pound "daisy cutter" bomb that had taken out an entire neighborhood in southeastern Kunduz. Hundreds of civilians lay scattered in bits of protoplasm amid the rubble. His editors killed the piece, calling it "redundant." He was an exception. The TV people, particularly the big American networks, were the worst. ABC News, for instance, paid $800 for a 12-mile ride from the Tajik border to the first town in Takhar Province. (The usual rate was 50 cents.) The TV guys eased the discomforts of Fourth World living by throwing around hundreds of thousands of dollars, bribing Northern Alliance warlords to put them up in their palatial compounds – electricity, hot water, beefy bodyguards, the works – and buying access to places where news was supposedly taking place. While they were off chasing fictional Osamas in mountain caves at fantastic expense, American bombs would strike civilian targets in the most obvious of places; only European journos would show up to cover those horrifying scenes. It never occurred to these well-fed American fools that relying for food, shelter and protection on the top officers of one side in a civil war might not give them the best vantage point for unbiased reporting. Here in America, reputable media outlets pride themselves on refusing to pay for news. That's why Gary Condit couldn't collect a buck for his interview with Connie Chung. But out in Afghanistan, all bets were off. Broadcast networks paid for interviews, access to battle zones and even rides into battle in the bowels of armored personnel carriers. Had everyone refused to pay, no one would have been fleeced. But war is the seventh circle of hell, and breeds such unseemly rat-like behavior among war junkies. Their unscrupulous conduct turned all journalists, whether from NBC or a Portugese radio station, into fat targets for robbery, rape and murder. Because the TV scum had driven up prices for all reporters, you needed at least $5,000 merely to buy food and a room for a few weeks. And in a nation with an average monthly income of $1.20, anyone who lifted those $5,000 from your bloody money belt would be set for life. Perhaps only the young soldiers who robbed and murdered 42-year-old Swedish cameraman Ulf Stromberg in his Taloqan guest house are legally responsible for widowing his wife, but surely the irresponsible behavior of well-funded TV personnel share the blame. More telling was the ignorance of Afghan war correspondents about basic facts concerning the war and its Central Asian theater. Of the dozens of journalists I met in Afghanistan, all were well-versed in the ins and outs of warfare in general, and many were unbelievably brave. But none had been in-country before, or even visited Central Asia. My mention of Bishkek drew blank stares from a news crew at the front. "You know, the capital of Kyrgyzstan," I tried. "It's north of here." Nothing. References to other important Central Asian cities – Ashkhabat, Astana, Kashgar – rang no bells for them. On another occasion I was interviewing Taliban POWs along with a reporter for a U.S. newspaper chain. "I can't believe that that guy came all the way from Chechnya," he commented, scribbling away as he gestured towards a square-faced inmate. "He didn't," I said. "He's Uyghur – a Muslim from western China." "What the hell would a Chinese person be doing here?" he asked. "Uyghurs are a horribly oppressed minority," I explained. "They want to break away Xinjiang province from China and form an independent Republic of East Turkestan. The Taliban supported and trained them. There are lots of those guys here." The writer didn't know that Afghanistan bordered China, didn't understand the international nature of the Taliban's appeal to jihad and thus misled millions of Americans with his ill-informed screeds. Even worse, he knew that he couldn't trust his instincts. Though he never personally witnessed an unveiled woman, for instance, he unquestioningly passed along the Northern Alliance line that burqas were no longer required. "Maybe it's different in other provinces," he said. It's not that I was any smarter than my fellow journalists. But I'd done my homework. I'd been to that part of the world five times before, and in the process I'd picked up a lot of useful information: how to tell an Uzbek from a Tajik, why Herat is the coolest city in Afghanistan and how much it costs to hitch a ride. I knew my way around, I knew how to deal with the locals and I was able to present my dispatches with a basic understanding of historical, political, cultural and religious contexts. My peers from the networks and the big papers, on the other hand, were used to flying around the world from one trouble spot to the next – and it showed in their inch-deep reports. "Aren't you going to the press conference?" was a question that greeted me whenever I chose to skip General Mohammed Daoud's morning propaganda briefing. What's the point of standing around, waiting to be lied to? More often than not, the most reliable information could be discovered by talking to newly-arrived refugees in the local bazaar. Instead the other journalists squandered day after day – they'd attend the damned briefings, bitch about them afterwards, but go ahead and report Daoud's lies. Most had to know it was Grade-A BS, but they had to file something, and detailed dissembling was better than nothing. I would have done the same thing if I'd been assigned to cover a place I knew nothing about. A century ago the press employed salaried bureau chiefs to sit around places like Kabul and La Paz in the expectation that something newsworthy might someday go down. It was expensive, but it worked; reports filed by long-term residents were smarter and truer than today's journalism-by-press-release. Decades of budget cuts by the corporate-chain media outlets have eliminated such "luxuries," but in fact posting overseas correspondents might well provide substantial savings. For example, someone who'd been living in Afghanistan would know not to pay $800 for a four-bit ride. Ted Rall's new book, a graphic travelogue about his recent coverage of the Afghan war titled "To Afghanistan and Back," is out now. Ordering and review-copy information are available at nbmpub.com. - Jewish Evangelian Imperialism lies, media swallows... - Big projects of bigger Imperialism needed a big provocation so coul eworld opinion manipulated... I think, this is the start of all uniformed terrors... First they terrorized the whole world like an electro-shock.. - 11/9 - I think so!.. Both McCarthy and Ariel Sharon generations always using same methodes to maniplate masses... - Are masses idiots... - No, not dircetly but there are instruments to turn the masses like the living robots... Look at their faces when they cries for blood!... And show me only one animal that cries so hysterical... - Yes, the majority seems nonsense pigs... - Pigs aren'ät nonsense, they only do what their nature demand... But masses are available to accept to massacre hundreds of people in Hiroshima-Nagasaki only by one click or you can see that they interested in artistic flower gardens, what the dominated administration aims... - I am afraid of the future of human being... - System... Terror comes not from other polanets; terror produces by our most performed modernized sytems, adiministrators, lobbies... ** - What say the Swedish authorities? - There is no single one independent authority in the northern EU this is the main question.. Sweden is a satellite of judaized Imperialism and therefore we couldn't see a clear evidence, but manipulation industry... - I understand!.. In silence but the Swedish constution describe many different versions of violence for instance "-Olaga hot", illegal threaten.. - Concrete examples? - Radio Islam har fått följande email, som vi pulicerar utan kommentar: Received: by www15.clever.net (8.9.1/8.9.0) id BAA23398 for radioislam; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 01:44:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from hotmail.com (f105.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.149.105]) by www15.clever.net (8.9.1/8.9.0) with SMTP id BAA23390 for Radio Islam ; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 01:44:01 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 13415 invoked by uid 0); 15 Nov 1999 06:43:46 -0000 Message-ID: <19991115064346.13413.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 62.20.37.132 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sun, 14 Nov 1999 22:43:45 PST X-Originating-IP: [62.20.37.132] From: "Medborgargarde M" To: Radio Islam Subject: KROSSA NAZZARNA OCH AHMED RAMI Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 07:43:45 CET X-UIDL: 60cbf8c8f3eeace02113a94a86867011 - Do you show me an example? I understand Svekish language!. I wish understand better what these letters include!.. - Welcome!.. Here; "DU ÄR DÖD AHMED RAMI DINA SISTA TIMMAR I LIVET BÖRJAR NÄR DU LÄSER DETTA MAIL. SE DEJ FÖR NÄR DU GÅR UT FÖR MAN VET INTE VAD SOM KAN HÄNDA. DU ÄR JU SJUK SOM HAR NAZZE JÄVLAR SOM VÄNNER MEN DET ÄR JU NAZZE JÄVLARNA OCKSÅ SOM ÄR MED DEJ SOM ÄR SVARTSKALLE. NI ÄR SÅ JÄVLA SJUKA HELA HÖGEN SÅ JAG BARA SPYR NÄR JAG TÄNKER PÅ DET. DU ÄR DÖD INNOM 48 TIMMAR. MEDBORGAGARDET" - Terrorist gang, I heard about it!.. - Yes' it's!.. This freak gang sent at least 400 pieces of such threaten messages!.. - Wht are the Authoruties doing? - Cows!.. Like cows they are lookng at thus trafficiking... - ?! ** - What does MedborgarGuard mean? - Armed leagues who want rule country... Citizen Guards, but not for ordinary citizen.. They serves to the rich citizens, specially the financial lobbies of Zionist Capitalism... There are collaborated sections beyond the open criminal gangs for example eXpo, Jewish organizations, party masked zionist politicians around of Fp, technicians like Lars Hornborg in Växjö and collaborated criminals aorund of all them... - I can add the "imported instruments" like traitoroyus Cubanos och Kurdish fascists... - ...much more... - I see, terrorism is a "second hand" industry of the Zionist Imperialism... - That's true!... ** - What are you thinking on these incredible scenes? - We must know that our weakness is Imperialism's strength, I understand here again... - I agree with you, Comrade Jonas Hållén! - You are welcome, Comrade Lars Törnman! ** - I think, democracy should work better!.. Criminals and collaborators should be arrested! - Should we arrest the criminals?!. Don't make me laugh! - Well, I see the double roles and false rules of the juridical instruments... What a shame we been forced to label it "democracy"... How thus majority of people, thus living creators, stinky mass could be so incredible nonsense blind meanwhile all the enormous fraudulent process?!.. Unbelieveable!... This is a glaring injustice!.. I wonder, what goes wrong by the juridical instruments... How can I say?! It is very strange!... You now, if you see all these incredible cases, thick-headed attitudes... - How? Do you explain? What is concrete that you remember? - Yes, I remember that David Janzon, a redactional worker of Radio Islam, was sentenced to 4 months' imprisonment in October 1992, for the station's agitation "against an ethnic group". Are the provocators of Capitalist Fascist lobbies are really a ethnical group?! - There is so specially groups? Okay, Jews!... It's the overclass group, nobody can imitate such shurks... - But when you been oppressed so your accusation can only be refuseed... The shurks are the masters 'cause they experinced a lot of cruel methodes since many years... You can only suffer like many freedom fighters... - Concrete cases? - Very much!... The judges of system who play dirty rolls... It is extra incredible on Swedish justice-scenes that many foolish judges been corrupted by Jewish authorities and they play extra horrible rolls as pycho-proff doctor magister at policlinics... I can not meet all the judges nor observate all the cases but I met many high-staff at Golf Club Tenerrife, they explained... Shameful!... I can not explain here what they say on the corrpted colleges, so awfully shameful... ... Court material look likes simetrical sences, reasons are too similarly... Many papers of court been published by the Bonniers, Nordstedt... Same mechanism publish as basic Zionist propagand material, too... EU-membership... After 1995 impressed it by the democratical authorities of other countries? - Unfortunately, it's in all frauds, much more dirty now... If any true jurist goes to United Nations related commissions or the independent justice authorities, so we shall most interesting scandals... - What kind of scandals? - For instance Osmo Vallo&Tony Mutka and other members of the "assassination on the so called Resande Folket" cases... Märta Pettersson and others who murdered by the "imported criminals" like Bengalian Zionist Mafia moblized in the EU; similarly recruitment cases... Remember; what the relatiives of Tony Deogan, Dagmar Hagelin, Anders Gustavsson demand... - Don't make me worry with examles, don't list please much more!.. - It's not me who create the official shame lists!.. Did you hear Osmo Vallo's two brothers and all other relatives are arrested, too... The victims and witness been arrested instead of murderers... Otherway, many freedom fighters forced to be jobless and living under minimal standards... Most famous concret case is Stefan Dimiter Tcholakov who labelled as "laborious" and Work Rights fighters Jimmie Östergren, delegated adviser (former grafiker) Bengt Pettersson and Ahmed Rami, because of these bravehearts criticized the thieves by the Capitalist Jewish lobbies... Laponians who fight for own mark and minority rights, therefore prisoned their representative character Olof T. Johansson, the true Socialists like Bengt Frejd, Sara Lidman, Staffan Ehnebom, so-called the "Free Speech Fighters", anti-Capitalist demonstranter like Jan Hatto, Sten Arne-Zerpe, Dietlieb Felderer, movements who struggle against the weapon-handlers like Henrik Westander (before professur-chair gift) and by his side likely flexible Calle Höglund, anti-Imperialists Hannes Westberg, Herman Schmid, journalists Staffan Beckman, Stefan Hjertén, free-mind intellectuals like Rainer Holm, Linus Brohult, honoured priest K. G. Hammar and hundreds of the anti-Imperialists who been registrated by the lobbies... - What is common with them? - Also! When a Fascist accuse them so judges punish the reviewers, immediately... But when the oppressed people leave any accusation acceptance, can easily be refuseed ... The requests of them almost been absolutely refuseed... Read two different cover of assassinations for example one victim called Daniel WRETSTRÖM and second one Tony DEOGAN; so you'll be shocked if you discover many incredible freakness, parallel points; for instance how the prosecutors and judges corrupted by financial lobbies and how all the gang members released, how the evidences disappointed, witnesses forced to go in silence or they disapponted, too... - Why the DN, Expressen and other big papers awoid of to publich these true stories?.. They awoid of to show the real discrimination?! Schindler's List was only a filmatic illusion, actually the true boss never gave a chance peace in communities... You know, Bonniers, Wallenberg, Bilderberg-gangs and "Bulldogs" drive the Swindlers' lists, means all the honoured intellectuals been registrated on their computers... Therefore Stockholm-Canberra changed to be second plot area of Jew York-Tel Aviv's armed Mafia... - Yes, it's!.. But what a lucky I have been warned before!. - The authorities are blind on such actions.. Why? - Because every big shurk drives by the big lobbies in this big SvekJa zionized Kingdom... - ?! - How can we could informed and know the truth!?... - I can't reply all in two minutes?! - Well!... I understand better... It's a modernised version of enormous hypocrisy... And I understand why the worlkd couldn't react when Jews slaughed people in Sabra, Shatila, Jenin... Everybody watched on tv meanwhile druck Coca-Cola, chips, bonbons... - Like the film-druged idiots?.. - No, Sir!... We have incredible reactions and collaborated feelings too, remember, we all cried when we watched on the Swindler's list, whole lies master-piece on scenes... - Shame on double-moral masters!.. Where are the all good peoples now?! - No way to Pessimism, please!.. Well, I see a positive case here on the Scandinavian Jewish DN, Expressen, Menorah pages; Maximum sentence for the desecration of cemeteries - an outrage which traditionally targeted Jewish cemeteries - was raised from 6 months' imprisonment to 2 years. Yes, the prisonment period raised in 1993, Spring. Then... - It should not calls for case; it's provocation... There is no any single case in SvekJa, means nobody sentenced, nobody improsined for desecrations.. - Maximum sentence will be 2 years! Isn't good? - I want not talk on the sentences good or not good... But I'm coming from Skaane and I witnessed who targeted the cemeteries... - Who? - Jews!... I saw them... They were there and porovoced very succesful so they manipulated sitation... Therefore there is no prisoner after this pharagraph ' cause they aimed change the rules... - I remember a similarly case, my mother witnessed and told us about the foxy Jews who played theatre at the street on 30 November in Germania... It was before WW III, Jewish fanatics crashed own glass and won enormous generous compensation by the reasurance firms... But their media manipulated the world by the help of american Imperialism so all the analphabets crying on every 30 September worldwide, every year like a crying festival, meantime the Zionist boss' laughing behind the windows... ** - This is not the Cold War but a form of ongoing Cold War, what drives now by the lobbies... This area demands the prejudiced scientists... - Why the oppressed folk don't protest or discuss these problems... - Ever and never! This is not the results of the football matches... People need knowledge on biological developments... - Biological? Bur the lobotomies and sterilization methodes were only in last century?! - System have now most avanced methodes for instance isolation, registration and systematically injustice... Only two tousand youngs become suicide in SvekJa Kingdom, two times been a short news.. - Youngs?... But adults? - They never counts by half officially pools.... Animal lover bourgeoisie have sex-partner-dogs, counts for identification and health rights, but not the discriminated persons... Never mind!... - There aren't really a single one modernized democratical institution? - ?! ** - I wonder why many immigrants sets to work without language courses meanwhile many others been discriminated because of their language is not "wonderful, brilliant"?.. - I met many people too... For example after Warszawa pakt's collapse fleed manybiologs to the occupied Middle East, Australia, SvekJa and specially the laboratory workers sets on the jobs without any oppression... - Did you found any explain about this subject?.. - Not directly... I met a family in SvekJa, who calls for BOLDTs, escaped from Baltics by the way of so-called "official Al Capone Raoul Wallenberg" Co's false Finnish pass and corrupted authorities in Kingdom by the way of Jewish lobbies... A cunning mature, drives "Invandrar Publications"... She explained that all these scientists had already one or two international languages what been respected... - She lies!.. I know a writer, know six or seven language but SvekJa system set him too the cleaner-catch boy courses... - Yes; I understand... Jolin replied this case too; "maybe the writer criticised the oligarchical targets..." - And she publish these subjects on the Invandrar Tidningen? Bravo!... - You will be chocked; she help to the lobbies to registrate opposite... - Was she biology-worker in Baltics... - No!... But system need such families to follow the people and therefore she didn't go to the claenar courses and nor any language course although her vocabulary is worst when I compare with other immigrants... Nowadays fixed this family a credit possbility by the lobbies and Swedish American authorities,looks like a support to publish weekly propagand bulletin, called "Sesam"... - Is it a propagand bulletin which the redacteurs in Jew York recommended? - Yes!... Worst and most dangerous in the world... - Do you explain; what you discovered by Sesam or chief Jolin Boldt or Jusek/jurists' judadominated syndical sect media runs by Göran Boldt Co. although this zionist gang never had a single one scientist in the family!.. - Yes, it's!.. But such chiefs are clever to use the regularly credits of system... I am an ordinary people and regularly reading all the issues of Sesam/Jusek falsification magazines and look at on these pages, what these gangsters provoce: "Immigrants always have problems.. They must complete their education and integrate to the democratical values..." Very provocative...It means if you never been accepted as true citizen so you must think that your education is low, complete it... If immigrated person is non-judaic originated must complete cources to be disher, even if man is professor.. But other immigrant who came from Warszawa and presented himself as academician, accepted to be professor wit´hout a true diplom.. If you criticize this dirty deal, riskable to be labelled that you collapsed on integration... - A kind of tregistrated psycho? - Definitely!.. This is a nonsense market... The masters of this neo-liberal "smiling fascist process" show no pardon... Since many years the Swedish immigrant publications run by the fascist zionist readcteurs, collaborators and inseminate false imagination... This is a insemination what the Zionist Fascists do against thesecond class people in Tel Aviv... In SvekJa Kingdom, by this shurk-coup drivessame project... Look at these pages, even the Laponians counts like the second class people and never discuss serious their minority rights, work rights by the industrial investigations of Kingdom... They handled often like the Gypsies,more worst; they handled like prisoners on its own marks like the Palestinians who prisoned his own haoses there in the occupied Middle East... Do you discussuor rights here on Immigrant pages? Never... Boldt have credit by Spaarbank and Nordea's Jew chiefs... Why? Because, Boldt-gang is the best flexible which uses like a condom against Human Rights...According of these shurks there is no any Zionist Occupational Gang in the world, but Palestinians been counted as problematics... Palestinians described like the immigrants there, what the oppressed people behandles here in SvekJa Kingdom... Boldt and her lap-dogs manipulate the questions of immigrants and never answer thequestions although there is two pages for responses... - I know a Jewish paper in USA, redacteur send letters himself and replies later instead of the true readers... - Similar tactic!... What Big Brother do, Swedish hypocrites just imitate it... Not only this fetty imbecill's Sesam, all other creit-addicted papers administrations making copies of ordinary people's letters... mostly all these half-officially "Invandrar" publication industry "brain washing instruments on the immigrants" running on this line... what thelobbies, so-called "registrationsnamnden" and the collaborators by the Swedish ministries like much and therefore pumping money.. - Now I have a little question; is Boldt-gangs are Jewish originated... - More dangereous... Members, so-called "edsvurna" by the Zionist lobbies!...But how you guess about the origins of these shurks?! - I am not so stupid although I like sometimes discuss football, too... - ...and maybe a private question, too!.. How you can be so close to Jolin!... - She like small and younger Africans like a tradition by the bourgeoisise fetties nowadays and it was plus point when she discovered I am from Ethiopia... - More question? - No more, 'cause I have already all the answers on this area specially experiences by such kind of chiefs who need my massage... This is biology, too; bio-physique... - But why all these lobbies hate Rainer Holm?.. Rainer is not immigrant.. - He registrated because of the critics againt the system and projects.. - What kind of system? Whose projects, whose rules? - Kidding? - ?! ** - Different faces but same play on the dirty scenes!.. - That is right!.. Unfortunately, a crow goes but another crow comes... Betrayers love eacht other and they always have supporters by the financial lobbies... For example Sparbank, Nordea, Associates thieves Co, Citibank/CitiGroup, even CSN and other similarly ziondominated betrayers, lean-mousetraps... - More dangerous than all other classical mafia examples... Because all these liberalized instruments have both legal and illegal leagues, different faces on the different scenes... - Flexible fascism!.. ** - Not only this case and such victims, all the anti-imperialists are the potentially criminals, according to the registrators of lobbies...They are suspicious in all cases, on all the connections... - They are suspicious perhaps only on our duties... Otherways I met an interesting gay, he talks perfect Persian like a true Iranian citizen, practiced around of Gulf... - Dehdari? Kamali? Tagawi? - Bijan Fahimi!.. This gay, Persian Zionist case enough to explain any connections between many Swedes... Such "imported instruments" help to compare with the opprtunities and opportunists for example these persons systematically been discrimined: Staffan Ehnebom, Jimmie Östergren, Ahmed Rami, Ernst Rainer Holm (regime critic worker, disappeared in Gaevle city just after May Day 2003), Henrik Westander, Osmo Vallo (murdered by police torture in Malmuu-city) and his prisoned brothers, Tony Deogan and Anders Gustavsson (both murdered by system supported violence leagues and prosecutors didn't accuse anyone because these poor boys weren't from bourgeoisie cathegories in the community and both criticized sytem by any articles before), Bengt Frejd, Olof T. Johansson, Sara Lidman, Calle Höglund, Belay Mekkonen, Hannes Westberg, Linus Brohult, Sven Wollter, Gunnar Thorell, Murat Yildiz, Bodil Margret Lindqvist, Staffan Beckman, Ísmet Celepli, Juan Fonseca (when he had not so intensive interesse on money), Ditlieb Felderer, Stefan Hjertén, Stefan Dimiter Tcholakov... - Is it dangerous to have same name? - Very riskable!.. Nephew Stefan forced to be psyhico because one of the his relatives in Balkan were the anti-Zionist guerilla leaders... One of the guerillas had same name forced for Independent Makedonia and jailed by false accusations of two Jewish judges from Bulgaria just after 1945. Guerilla leader had no possibility to defence himself, Jewish judges published only the false accusations, including fictive movements who leaned weapon from Germania under WW II. Although many corrupted judges and prosecutors were the traitors, this power manipulated history; nobody succeed to choose what is right what is wrong by medial campaigns... Guerillas, like "Uncle Tcholakov" sentenced without any minimal evidence.. He died there... We see another Tcholakov in Scandinavia, immgrated, but pursued and falled in incredible troubles... This nephew Tcholakov, "immigrated heimatlos Stefan" borned in 1944 as Dimiter, become a brilliant academical carrier in Sofia university and fleed to SvekJa Kingdom, completed 180 university points but prevented from work life, pursued, isolated, discriminated by the the Jewish registrators, lobbies, specially the collaborators of Clas Lilja "genetical-researcher Zionist clan" members in the Waexsjö city university... I can add other figures, too; for example the victims from West Front like Robert Malecki as true Vietnam deserter and as second category; Jan Myrdal, Teddy John Frank, Frank Baude, Peter Bratt, (his cell-shared-comrade Jan Guillou pissed off from lists because he is a multi-milliarder rich, reached to be droged creatur at last), Dagmar Hagelin (been pursued by Zionist lobbies who collaborated with dictators of South America and murdered there by fascist military of Astiz.. Dagmar murdered because her father listed as Marxist and very interesting now, his family affected by persecution, all the relatives troubled similarly case and systematically hunting by the Zionist lobbies), Torsten Leander (only this one pursued person compensed as symbolic maneouver), Work Rights Fighters Jimmie Östergren from Högdalen and his ombudsman Bengt Pettersson from Folks house Raagsved Ghetto district, Lilian Gustavsson who is mother to Anders, 17, murdered by torture methodes of bulldog Anders Carlsberg's fascist boys at Fyrshuset trainee center in Hammarby bourgeoisie area of capitol. After that Anders Carlberg prized as Integration chief and poor mother Lilian still betrays by the Jewish manipulation center Expo's "professional liars"... - It looks like a living history... - That is right and tv redaction collected much more figures, the names of the victims, all the almost anti-imperialists... - The "Human enemies" will not like to talk on such cases.. They hate the truth... - It's true!... The profiteers of system hate human being... We collected here hundreds of names... Count please the victims of Estonia ferry, which used to transferring the nuclear weapons to the West and sinked by an explosion; prosecutors hunted the criticer intellectuals not the criminal propagandists of Jewish DN-Expressen-Menorah falsificators nor the boss of weapon markets...... Why thus people counts in two different categories and what is difference between two oppressed or only been registrated followed people I don't understand... But you can notice much more if you visit Veritas Co. Veritas fraud league is a computer and distribution which serve the falsificators, Swedes call him "Jankele Pirat kopiormästaren!", means "Bitch falsificator masters' bastard"... - What is common with all these plays? What is the connection but with our tennisplayer monkey? - That is the question... They don't know anything and therefore we are on the duty, means their unknowledge is our gain... - Game?! - You need go to the ear specialist, my friend; Nordic climate is not fit to your upside... - ?! ** - Please, my friend!... Take these coverages back to the archives!.. Explain nothing there, outside;please! I'll do tanksgiving because I have only ond year to be retired.. - Wait!.. Wait!.. My son and daughters already at AMS and their fiancees fixed places at Länsarbetsnämnden, Migration teater's integrationsverket.. It was difficult to be staff there, without any true exam, nor really job interviews... We mustn't leave their situations on risk!.. - ?! ** - I witnessed any related cases... But a woman who formated this explain she was been guilt, instead of the suspected persons... Don't make laugh on such stories, please!... One of these writers named Bodil Margret Lindqvist wrote a saga/story and faced PUL when the Evangelist coup of Swedish church spioned her... But folks insist to be solidarised with Bodil Margret Lindqvist... Dod you know, why? Resistance against discrimination... Saga on Ulf BERG , for instance, this saga is a strong file of Bodil's works... Saga-files are a kind of action; yes, I should remember that Bodil Margret Lindqvist was VPK-follower rebel... - VPK? - Vaensterpartiet kommunisterna.. Main European leftist parties changed themselves but traditionally hate clans of zionist imperialism didn'rt change the persecution process on the antiimperialists... - They hate human being... - That's right!.. This is one of the reasons; yes, she was a famous member by Communist Party... There are any related explains on her own homepages what she been attacked and therefore cleaned many pages.. An example about the first story pages of Bodil Margret Lindqvist: http://home.bip.net/mors/saga.html Bodil's ordinary corrected (nicked A. Maria Oilworkerson) short reserv page: http://pub.alxnet.com/guestbook?id=1034058 Short story creations like Comrade Bodil's extra diary pages: http://pub.alxnet.com/guestbook?id=2346394 There are many solidaríty groups around such anti-imperialist figures for example, the readers' notices to the story teller Bodil: http://books.dreambook.com/boa100/boa102.html http://books.dreambook.com/boa100/boa102.sign.html Bodil's close friend Comrade Jörgen "Snegroy" (second nick: Kennedy Palme) built a support page: http://www.javascript.nu/cgi4free/guestbook/guestbook.pl?account=snegroj3&link - ...so far you works on Internet, it's possible that anybody try to manipulate it..... - That is right!.. Tere are many fanatics like Livets ord and other fascist lkeagues who attacking the anti-imperialists. - Definitely!.. Bodil's works been attacked by Livets ord... There are many server, like Maccabi Jewish staff and fake Anti-Fa homepages... They still contunie to manipulate... This is the true terror, advanced by technical support lobbies... - Sometimes we see good friends, who show very useful solidarity for instance Jörgen K.; he is Bodil's close friend, struggles well. - This is the "True Living history"... - If you have any question so I recommend you'll call to this civil-courage symbol, "Story-teller".. Here is the directly phone: Bodil Margret Lindqvist tel. 00.46.31.746 48 03 e-mail: 031.3310815@telia.com - 031? - Mölndal, Vetlanda... - Wet? Land? - Yes, it's is a piece of SvekJa Kingdom!... ** - Even it's not acceptable!.. My heart says; "No!.." - What is most unfair? - To be handled like the animals in the farm of George Orwell.. Look at all these masters of swindler who have two-legs only difference between the other kind of piggs... - I understand your reactions!... But if you insist to go on the last two legs, riskable that you can be sanctioned.. Did you heard that many people gone suicide? - Media didn't explain...... - Whose media? Anyway there are many people, even an ordinary list can take many pages of newspapers... Advertisements are important than suicide victims, nowadays... - You mean that the system can piss off... - Legalized cleansing by modernized methodes... Hundreds of people commit suicide only in last year... - Human? - ?! ** - I wonder what is the reason this story-teller uses a strange grammar.. Bad english, according to the web administrations.... Worst than my chief's school english level... - I understand you, too!.. But you know, I met this autor, a clever girl who can talk wonderful.. I mean, she is a successful person when she talks plenty fluently on other matters... - But why this girl tells her story in so incredible strange english? - I try to explain!... Yes, I asked her about this flat language... She replied; "When I wrote in correct english, pissed off by the bourgeoisie dominated media"... So, after this explain I checked it and witnessed that she has right... - I wonder the majority been masochists nowadays?! - Ye', it is stranger than language!... ... Maybe we are living in a period there bourgeoisie living a social sickness like mass masochistical delusion system... We piss off the normally attitudes... - Also, you mean the autor aims to write good tales in bed grammar to fix the barries of establishment on this sick medial world... - Approximately... - But she make folks laugh!... Please, watch this clip, super irritable bad english.. She makes me laugh, too!... - Sure!.. Story teller aims it... Otherwise, you are a living evidence that she succeed to make laugh you like any other pieces of this oligarchical system!.. - What!?.. - ...and at last this story teller added that she believe in "Mankind changed so much, nowadays civilizated people mostly looks like a kind of animal who can learn during laughing"... - ?! ** - This broadcasting clip remind me of "the Invisible Writers". - What does "invisible writer" mean? - Many years ago I knew a grizzled old playwright named Ray. He lived off state disability checks, carried his manuscripts in brown paper bags, and drank cup after cup of black coffee, which I poured for him from behind the counter of the coffee shop where I worked. He had one piece of advice for me: "Read Othello. If you want to be a writer you must first read Othello." Ray was a blue-collar guy who had never gone to college, but he had read Shakespeare, checked out from the public library near the furnished room where he lived. Ray understood plot because he had lived and experienced it. He was a born writer. Over the years I've met a diverse collection of writers who have never been published or earned any academic credentials, yet whose claim to the title of artist is genuine. These invisible writers are soldiers and bakers, convicts and salesmen, winos, hairdressers, firefighters, farmers and waitresses. Their only qualifications to literary authenticity are their writings and their desire to write. Often the only time they have is stolen time, and their private scrawls end up on cocktail napkins, penciled in the margins of receipts, on any piece of paper handy. I got to know Tom Carson during the first Gulf War, shortly after his platoon had been sent to Kuwait. We never met in person. He had written to a co-worker of mine who had moved on, leaving no forwarding address. When I saw the U.S. military return address on Tom's letter, I decided to answer it myself. We began a correspondence that lasted through the war and after he returned to Fort Benning, Georgia. During a hectic two months, Lt. Carson wrote 39 poems. His themes were the regimented insanity of military life, isolation and loneliness, the wind and rain of his soul. Carson wrote his lines in rare solitude, in a barracks or a tent. During the day, he told me, the thoughts gathered in his head; he censored them but the forbidden words found expression anyway, for even the U.S. Army cannot discipline the imagination. People imprisoned in stultifying, menial jobs can summon, with even a minimal command of language, something entirely private, unfettered and incalculably powerful. Most importantly, it is something of their own creation that cannot be taken away. The sense of purpose and identity that comes with being a writer, creator of a private world, can be life altering. I've known truck drivers who are natural-born storytellers; fishermen who paint starkly beautiful word pictures of life on a crab boat in the Bering Strait. I met a barely literate ex-convict whose short story about losing his wife and child in a revenge killing for a gang crime he'd committed was the most heartbreaking thing I've ever read. I met a ex-alcoholic who wrote about being abandoned by her husband. In a few simple paragraphs this uneducated woman in her mid-50s expressed a universal sense of loss in an entirely unsentimental fashion; something that cannot be taught in any MFA program. My own father, a novelist who was never published, once wrote about being fired for writing on the job – a chronic problem in his lifetime. He worked on an assembly line in a factory that manufactured radios, and the foreman caught him writing one day while the neglected radio parts moved past him on the belt. "I was only half a radioman," wrote my father. "In my heart, I was a poet." As Chester Himes wrote in "The Quality of Hurt": "No matter what I did or how I lived, I had considered myself a writer....It was my salvation. The world can deny me all other employment, and stone me as an ex-convict...as a disagreeable, unpleasant person. But as long as I write whether it's published or not, I'm a writer." I met Celia at a roadside diner, where she cooked greasy breakfasts for travelers whose faces she'd never again see. Writing, for Celia, was a way of being elsewhere, of undoing, undreaming, her mundane daily life. The monotony of her job and the deadening rituals she performed daily were the inspirations for the poems she scribbled on used order tickets. To hate your job and do nothing about it is a failure of imagination: a true life sentence. A Frenchman I know who was a maitre d' at one of the Washington's finest restaurants, possesses a novel he composed in the twilight time between the lunch rush and the dinner hour. His joy on writing it was immeasurable. That it may never be published did not faze him. The point is that he created it. He finished it. It is his. "Fiction completes us, mutilated beings burdened with the awful dichotomy of having only one life and the ability to desire a thousand," Mario Vargas Llosa wrote. I've often looked for my old playwright friend Ray's name in print, but have never seen it. I imagine him sitting in a coffee shop somewhere, brow furrowed as he revises lines of his latest play, completely absorbed in the world of his characters. I'm sure it frustrated Ray at times, that his work went unrecognized, but it never occurred to him to quit; just like it would never occur to him to stop breathing. It is not strictly a tragedy that Ray's plays, the maitre'd's novel or Celia's poems remain unpublished. Much of the work comes into being for private reasons of the heart. If every sentence that was written was printed and bound we would drown in a sea of words – as it is, thousands of books are hastily published, barely read and forgotten. Writing itself is the aim, for it is writing, not publishing, that transforms individual human experience. To write, even in obscurity is worthwhile. As Samuel Becket put it, writing is a way of leaving "a stain upon the silence." - It's true!.. Wonderful described and we are listening a kind of the "stain upon the silence", just here... ** - Tv Independent Laponia got a short list on the fascist league eXpo and collaborated zionist criminals... - Let's watch it!.. - Welcome, Comrados!.. These main figures threat free speech... Unfortunatley, many guests are from Scandinavia and talking a strange language.. - No problem, I understand this strange language, called "Svekish".. - Okay!.. Start, Sir!.. ** - I en annan del av ovan citerade ledare erkänner Expo att Hübinette's kriminella bakgrund "varit välkänd bland ett stort antal journalister". Då eXpo-redaktören avslöjat att han trots Hübinette's feltramp ändå "hyser största förtroende för honom", skall vi titta på vad Hübinette sade i en artikel i nummer 1 av tidskriften Creol, 1996: "Att känna eller t o m tycka att den vita rasen är underlägsen på alla upptänkliga plan är naturligt med tanke på dess historia och nuvarande handlingar. Låt den vita rasens västerland gå under i blod och lidande. Leve det mångkulturella, rasblandade, och klasslösa ekologiska samhället! Leve anarkin!" Uppenbarligen har vi här att göra med en fullblodsrasist, som talar om en "underlägsen" "ras" som skall "gå under i blod och lidande". Detta är alltså inte ett citat från en förment nazist utan från en av våra massmedier hyllad "antirasist"! Och denne rasist säger alltså Expos ledning att man "hyser största förtroende för"! Rasisten Tobias Hübinette's nära samarbete med Svenska Kommittén mot Antisemitism, Israels propagandaorgan, reserv Mo$$ad gurka-troop i Sverige, är också talande både avseende hans egna politiska preferenser och Kommitténs val av partners. Hübinette har skrivit boken "Nationalsocialismens symboler" (Expo och Svenska Kommittén mot Antisemitism, 1997) tillsammans med Stéphane Bruchfeld, den man som också författat den statliga kampanjskriften "Om detta må ni berätta". Stéphane Bruchfeld är kanslichef på Svenska Kommittén mot Antisemitism, den svenska underavdelningen till B´nai B´riths ADL; en av eXpo's sponsorer. Boken "Nationalsocialismens symboler" är rekommenderad på regeringens hemsida om "förintelsen", "Levande historia". Hübinette var helt nyligen aktuell som researcher till boken och TV-serien "Svenskarna som stred för Hitler" och i januari 2000 kunde man se judarna använda Tobias Hübinette under sin pågående "förintelse"-kampanj och "förintelse"-konferens. Hans namn dyker då upp i samband med en debattkväll på Kulturhuset 27:e januari . Han var inbjuden dit i egenskap av författare till boken "Hatets återkomst" (talande titel) och skulle bl.a. tala på temat "antisemitismens idéhistoria och nynazism i dagens Sverige". Det visar att det officiella Sverige inte tagit avstånd från rasisten Hübinette, utan att han omhuldas som en sjusärdeles bra medborgare. - ... och "Peter Karlsson"? - "Vi på Expo tar helt avstånd från våldsmetoder, vi har alltid gjort det och kommer alltid att göra det. Att en av våra medarbetare ägnade sig åt detta för två år sedan innebär inte att redaktionen godkänner dessa metoder. Personen ifråga tar idag helt avstånd från dessa metoder. Detta är och förblir vår hållning. Vi har heller inget samröre med AFA, och delar heller inte dess syn på hur det antinazistiska arbetet skall bedrivas." Undertecknat: af Expo Redaktionen Ovanstående citat publicerades i tidningen Dagens Resumé (nr. 25, 1996) som försvar till den f.d. Expomedarbetaren Tobias HÜBINETTE's förflutna som våldsverkare och medlem inom AFA. Detta uttalande ter sig synnerligen lustigt för den som granskat resterande medarbetare, då fler dömda personer gömmer sig bakom pseudonymerna på Expos redaktion, däribland "Peter Karlsson". "Peter Karlsson" är pseudonymen på "frilansjournalisten" som blev mediakändis då han sommaren 1999 utsattes för ett bilbombsattentat i Nacka. Kopplingarna mellan honom och Expo är flera: Förutom hans delaktighet i artikeln "Sverige - störst i världen på nazirock" (Expo, nr. 6 1996), titulerar sig både han och "Katarina Larsson" som "f.d. medarbetare på tidningen Expo" i en artikel i Aftonbladet den 12 augusti 1998. Ytterligare ett exempel står att finna den 7 juni 1996, även denna gång i Aftonbladet. Den sjätte juni 1996 genomförde Stockholmspolisen en uppmärksammad razzia gentemot Nationella Alliansens lokal på Tomtebogatan i centrala Stockholm. Vid tillfället konfiskerades bland annat en dator som man från polisens sida misstänkte kunde innehålla upplysningar om de personer som deltagit i "kampanjen mot Expo". Dagen efter razzian, det vill säga den 7 juni 1996, kunde man i en artikel publicerad i Aftonbladet, läsa om den aktuella incidenten. I artikeln stod bl.a. följande citat att läsa: "Jag tror polisen griper dem, säger journalisten Peter Karlsson på Expo." "Och jag tror gärningsmännen är jävligt skraja nu, för de hade inte väntat sig det här enorma stödet för oss." I en Expo-artikel i Svartvitt med Expo, nr. 3/4, 1999, efter bombattentatet mot "Peter Karlsson", tillstod man också från Expos sida att "de båda Nackajournalisterna har tidigare varit medarbetare i tidskriften Expo". Expomedarbetaren "Peter Karlsson" är välkänd som en av ledarna inom våldsgruppen AFA (Antifascistisk aktion). Under tiden som medarbetare på den antirasistiska tidningen Expo var han samtidigt verksam inom AFA tillsammans med Tobias Hübinette. "Peter Karlsson" har ett digert våldsregister som AFA-aktivist. Om detta står omfattande dokumenterat i skriften "Gatstens- och brandbombs"journalism". Mest anmärkningsvärt är kopplingen mellan "Peter Karlsson" och attacken mot Ahmed Rami och Robert Faurisson i samband med Radio Islams möte på Van der Nootska platset 1993. Den judiska terrorgruppen Betar-Tagar, baserad i Frankrike under ledning a